Santa Rosa de Calamuchita · Sierras de Córdoba
🇦🇷 BL4S 2026 · Santa Rosa de Calamuchita, Córdoba · Instituto San Francisco de Asís

Two objects.
The same river.
The same problem.

Comechingon mortars carved 2,000 years ago and mixed contemporary plastic debris share the same river — and the same challenge: identify without destroying.

Can a particle beam reveal the internal composition of a material?
EXPLORE

On the banks of the Río Santa Rosa,
two worlds, the same question.

Our city has something unusual: in the same stretch of river, an untouchable archaeological heritage and an urgent industrial challenge coexist. Both need the same thing: to know what they are made of, without destroying them.

The Río Santa Rosa — rises in the Sierras de Comechingones (≈ 1,550 m.a.s.l.), flows 58 km to the Río Tercero Reservoir. Its flow shapes the valley, its biodiversity, and the city's identity.

Morteros comechingones · Río Santa Rosa
🪨 Comechingon mortars · Río Santa Rosa
🪨

The Comechingon mortars

Carved into living rock two thousand years ago, on the banks of the Río Santa Rosa. They are provincial archaeological heritage — no analysis may damage them. SiO₂? CaCO₃? Fe₂O₃? Without taking samples, it is currently impossible to know.

CHALLENGE: characterise mineral composition without damaging the piece
Plásticos flotando · Río Santa Rosa
♻️ Plastic debris · Embalse
♻️

The recycling cooperative's plastics

Recycling cooperatives in Córdoba receive mixed plastics. A single container of PVC contaminates the entire batch and releases HCl when melted. Without fast, non-destructive identification, recycling cannot scale.

CHALLENGE: PE? PET? PVC? — in seconds, at industrial scale
The same technique can solve both: multiple Coulomb scattering with a particle beam.

Every material leaves
a unique angular fingerprint.

A high-energy particle passes through matter and is deflected by atomic nuclei — many times, at small angles. The average exit angle (θ₀) depends on the atomic composition of the material, not its colour or shape. Heavy atoms (chlorine, iron, lead) scatter more. Light atoms (carbon, hydrogen) scatter less.

θ₀ ≈ (13.6 MeV / p·c) · √(x / X₀) · [1 + 0.038 · ln(x/X₀)] p = beam momentum  ·  x = target thickness  ·  X₀ = radiation length (the material's fingerprint — what we measure)
▶ SIMULATION — Change momentum and thickness to see what happens
1 GeV/c4 GeV/c7 GeV/c
1 mm15 mm40 mm

Minimalist by design.
Trackers, target, and the angular difference.

We need no magnet or calorimeter. The arrangement is simple and minimalist: four position detectors aligned to measure the beam trajectory before and after the material. This type of configuration is similar to those used in educational particle physics experiments and university muon telescopes.

By comparing the entry and exit directions, we obtain the angular deflection produced by the material. That angular difference is all the information needed for the analysis.

HAZ e⁻ 1–7 GeV/c T1 T2 TARGET interchangeable PE / PP / PS PVC · PET SiO₂ · CaCO₃ Al₂O₃ · Fe₂O₃ Al · Fe · Pb θ₀ T3 T4 DAQ measures angle entry / exit Δθ = θ₀ del material CERN SPS / PS North Area
NO MAGNET

We only need silicon trackers — standard equipment at any BL4S facility. Works with e⁻ or π at 1–7 GeV/c.

YAML → RESULT IN 30s

Each study is configured in a YAML file. GitHub Actions runs the Highland prediction automatically and publishes the results.

NON-DESTRUCTIVE

The sample remains intact. The same Comechingon mortar can be analysed without removing any fraction of rock.

Nine questions
born from our proposal.

Each team member formulated their own question, derived directly from our central proposal: what can we see in the Río Santa Rosa that no one has measured yet? Each one wrote the YAML, ran the Highland prediction, and analysed the results. The graphs are real data from results/.

▸ Jeremías Álvarez
"How does scattering vary with beam momentum for all available materials?"
author: "Jeremías Álvarez"
momenta_GeV: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
materials: PE, PP, PS, PMMA, Nylon, PET, PVC, SiO₂, CaCO₃, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, Al, Fe, Pb
num_events: 10000
θ₀ ∝ 1/p confirmed across all materials. At 1 GeV/c Pb scatters 18.5 mrad — PE only 1.7 mrad. Factor ×11 in separation.
▸ Agustina
"How does scattering scale with thickness? And can the minerals in the mortars be identified without damaging them?"
analysis 1: PMMA · PVC · Quartz — 4 GeV/c — 2 to 40 mm
analysis 2: SiO₂ · CaCO₃ · Al₂O₃ · Fe₂O₃ — 3/6 GeV/c — 5/10/20 mm
The √x/X₀ law holds: at 40 mm the PMMA–Quartz gap is ×1.7. And the four mortar minerals have unique fingerprints — Fe₂O₃ scatters ×2 more than SiO₂ at 10 mm. The Comechingon rock can be read without touching it.
▸ Iskya
"Can MCS distinguish PE from PET to classify recyclable plastics? And detect modern restorations in archaeological objects?"
author: "Iskya"
studies: iskya_pe_vs_pet · modern-vs-ancient
momenta_GeV: [2.0, 4.0, 6.0]
num_events: 10000 · 15000
♻ STUDY 1 · RECYCLING
🏛 STUDY 2 · ARCHAEOLOGY
3σ separation is achieved with very low statistics: 235 events for PE vs PET and 131 events for cement vs traditional mix, confirming the practical viability of the method.
▸ Arturo
"Can BeamScan distinguish the Comechingon minerals — quartz, calcite, alumina, iron pigment — from each other?"
author: "ArturoS"
momenta_GeV: [2.6 → 5.0] # 13 puntos
materials: Quartz, Calcite, Alumina, Iron_pigment
num_events: 20000
Iron pigment (Fe₂O₃) dominates: 2.75 mrad at 2.6 GeV/c vs 1.35 mrad for quartz. Quartz↔Fe₂O₃ separable with 39 events. Calcite↔Alumina requires 1,491.
▸ Tomás Blanco
"Can BeamScan differentiate Fe₂O₃ (iron oxide) from pure aluminium at different energies?"
author: "Tomás Blanco"
momenta_GeV: [2.0, 4.0, 6.0]
materials: Fe₂O₃, Aluminium
num_events: 10000
Fe₂O₃ scatters 3.57 mrad at 2 GeV/c — Al only 2.09 mrad. Factor ×1.7 difference. 3σ separation with only 66 events.
▸ Federico Bustillo
"Can polyethylene (PE) be distinguished from PVC using electron scattering?"
author: "Federico_Bustillo"
momenta_GeV: [3.0, 6.0]
materials: PE, PVC
num_events: 10000
PE: 0.559 mrad vs PVC: 0.901 mrad at 3 GeV/c — ratio ×1.6. The chlorine in PVC noticeably increases scattering. 3σ with 82 events.
▸ Lorenzo Medina Giovanini
"How does scattering of CaCO₃ (calcite/marble) depend on thickness AND momentum simultaneously?"
author: "Lorenzo Medina Giovanini"
momenta_GeV: [3.0, 4.5, 6.0]
thickness_mm: [5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
num_events: 10000
2D scan: θ₀ ranges from 0.48 mrad (5mm, 6 GeV/c) to 2.32 mrad (25mm, 3 GeV/c). The 3σ separation grid shows that all pairs are easily distinguishable.
▸ Maia Yallbi
"Can MCS distinguish traditional pottery (Comechingon clay) from modern silica brick?"
author: "Maia Yallbi"
momenta_GeV: [3.0, 6.0]
materials: Ceramic (custom clay), Modern brick (silica)
num_events: 10000
Ceramic: 1.014 mrad vs brick: 1.457 mrad at 3 GeV/c. Modern silica brick scatters more due to its lower X₀. 3σ separation with 140 events.
▸ Paula Baraldo
"Can a hidden lead vein inside a quartz rock be detected without opening it?"
author: "Paula"
momenta_GeV: [2.0, 5.0, 7.0]
thickness_mm: SiO₂ 10 mm + Pb 0.1 / 0.5 / 1.0 mm
A 1 mm Pb vein raises θ₀ from 1.75 → 2.68 mrad at 2 GeV/c (×1.5). At 0.1 mm lead is nearly invisible — but from 0.5 mm it reveals itself. 3σ discrimination with only 103 events.

Each material occupies
a unique position in the plane.

Measuring θ₀ at 3 and 6 GeV/c, each material is fixed in the plane. Light plastics at bottom-left. Heavy minerals and metals at top-right. PVC separates from the plastic cluster due to its chlorine. The metals from Jeremías's study extend the atlas towards the most extreme zone.

Hover over the points to see more information.

How many events do we need
to distinguish two materials?

3σ discrimination between two materials depends on how different their θ₀ values are. Similar pairs (PE/PP, PMMA/Nylon) need many more events than dissimilar pairs (PE/Fe₂O₃).

▸ VIEW DATA SOURCES
  • results/full_classification/
  • results/iskya_pe_vs_pet/
  • results/arturo_heritage_study/
  • results/Tomas_Fe2o3vsAl/
  • results/maia_CeramicvsModernBrick/
  • results/lorenzo_caco3_thickness_momentum_scan/
PE ↔ PVC
82
events for 3σ

Bustillo — the chlorine in PVC gives it away. Very easy at any momentum.

Fe₂O₃ ↔ Al
66
eventos para 3σ

Tomás — iron oxide vs pure aluminium. Factor ×1.7 in angular difference.

SiO₂ ↔ Fe₂O₃
39
eventos para 3σ

Arturo — quartz vs iron pigment, key for the Comechingon mortars.

Mineral ↔ Cemento
131
eventos para 3σ

Iskya — detecting modern restorations in archaeological pieces.

Cerámica ↔ Ladrillo
140
eventos para 3σ

Maia — Comechingon clay vs modern silica brick. Ceramic authentication.

PE ↔ PET
235
eventos para 3σ

Iskya — classification of recyclable plastics in cooperatives.

CaCO₃ 5mm ↔ 25mm
31
eventos para 3σ

Lorenzo — thickness resolution in calcite/marble at 3 GeV/c. 2D scan.

PMMA ↔ PVC (2mm)
205
eventos para 3σ

Agustina — discrimination with a thin target, validating the √x/X₀ law.

PE ↔ PP
551.308
eventos para 3σ

Too similar in X₀ (47.9 vs 47.4 cm) — a fundamental limit of the method.

⚠ The honest limit

Multiple scattering distinguishes materials by their atomic composition, not their molecular structure. PE and PP have nearly the same X₀ (47.9 vs 47.4 cm) because they are equally light. These are the limits of the method, and we know them before going to CERN.

Los Topos Cósmicos.

"We live in a small city, but we dream big."
Institution
Instituto San Francisco de Asís · Santa Rosa de Calamuchita, Córdoba
Members
Jeremías Alexander Alvarez Olazo · Paula Baraldo Vargas · Tomás Andrés Blanco · Federico Tomás Bustillo · Ricardo Joaquín Carabajal Albornoz · Fiorella Delfina Cores · Lorenzo Medina Giovanini · Matías Alberto Rodriguez Wagner · Maia Yallbi
Programme
Beamline for Schools 2026 · CERN
Los Topos Cósmicos — equipo BL4S 2026
Jeremías · Tomás · Fiorella · Maia · Federico · Paula · Lorenzo · Ricardo · Matías — Instituto San Francisco de Asís

This project does not
belong to us alone.

The BeamScan proposal was born at the intersection of particle physics and the land we inhabit. There are people and institutions without whom this would not have been possible.

Museo Arqueológico Estanislao Baños · Santa Rosa de Calamuchita
Collaborating institution
Museo de la Ciudad
Estanislao Baños
Santa Rosa de Calamuchita, Córdoba. They opened their doors to help us study the Comechingon mortars and understand the heritage context of our research question. Their archive and collection are the root of BeamScan's archaeological line.
→ Visit the museum's website
Coaches & guides
A
Arturo Sánchez Pineda
Scientific guide · Particle physics
BeamScan would not be what it is without Arturo. He accompanied us throughout the technical process: he turned multiple Coulomb scattering into something we could work with confidently and helped us convert our ideas into concrete tools. He answered questions at any hour and believed  that a group of students from Santa Rosa de Calamuchita could do serious physics. Thank you, Arturo.
↗ LinkedIn
A
Agustina Berenice Rodríguez
Coach & teacher · Industrial Processes track
↗ LinkedIn
I
Iskya García
Coach & teacher · Industrial Processes track
↗ LinkedIn
Instituto San Francisco de Asís
Educational institution
Instituto San Francisco de Asís
Santa Rosa de Calamuchita, Córdoba. Our school has been supporting our participation in BL4S from day one — opening spaces, accompanying the process, and believing that particle physics can be born in the mountains.
↗ Instagram